feat(rm): add localized prompt messages for interactive mode

[mattsu2020]

Add translations for rm command prompts in English and French, and update Linux-specific code to use localized strings instead of hardcoded messages, improving internationalization support.

related
#9824

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Note: The gnu test tests/id/smack was skipped on 'main' but is now failing.
Note: The gnu test tests/mkdir/smack-no-root was skipped on 'main' but is now failing.
Note: The gnu test tests/mkdir/smack-root was skipped on 'main' but is now failing.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Congrats! The gnu test tests/stty/bad-speed is now passing!

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Congrats! The gnu test tests/seq/seq-epipe is now passing!

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Congrats! The gnu test tests/seq/seq-epipe is now passing!

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Congrats! The gnu test tests/pr/bounded-memory is no longer failing!

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/cut/bounded-memory is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Congrats! The gnu test tests/rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM is now passing!

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 3.43%

⚠️ 4 benchmarks spent significant time in system calls

System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.

Measurement and system calls

• rm_recursive_tree
• rm_single_file
• rm_multiple_files
• rm_force_files

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 7 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 448 skipped benchmarks¹

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡ ⚠️	Simulation	rm_recursive_tree	14.4 ms	13.9 ms	+3.43%

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing mattsu2020:rm_fix (a41a3a9) with main (6292c03)}

Footnotes

1. 448 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/misc/io-errors (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM is now being skipped but was previously passing.