Skip to content

refactor(uucore): reformat imports - #15610

Draft
xtqqczze wants to merge 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:refactor/uucore-module-imports
Draft

xtqqczze wants to merge 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:refactor/uucore-module-imports

Conversation

@xtqqczze

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Run rustfmt with imports_granularity = "Module" to group imports by module.

Run `rustfmt` with `imports_granularity = "Module"` to group imports by module.
@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Oct 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will regress 1 benchmark

1 warning, 1 note

⚠️ 120 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

ℹ️ 1 benchmark has no flamegraph

The flamegraph wasn't generated: most of the time was spent in runtime internals, which would leave nothing useful to analyze.

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 398 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 70 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ Memory cp_recursive_deep_tree[(120, 4)] 532.6 KB 699.2 KB -23.82%
⚡ CPU Simulation complex_relative_date 386.2 µs 277.7 µs +39.08%
⚡ Memory du_deep_tree[(100, 3)] 82.4 KB 76.5 KB +7.68%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing xtqqczze:refactor/uucore-module-imports (3c14f72) with main (4939cd4)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 70 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

  2. No successful run was found on main (2f8b194) during the generation of this report, so 4939cd4 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

@xtqqczze

xtqqczze commented Oct 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Fuzzing failures tracked by #15567.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant