[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
memmap2	workspace.dependencies	patch	0.9.11 → 0.9.12

---

Release Notes

RazrFalcon/memmap2-rs (memmap2)

v0.9.12

Compare Source

Added

• Add MmapOptions::map_if_safe() to allow creation read-only mappings of a file from safe code if the kernel can guarantee the file is immutable and large enough.
  @​alexlarsson
• Add MmapOptions::no_probe_handle() to disable probing of file handles on Windows to improve performance, at the cost of no longer being able to remap later with more capabilities.
  @​mat-gas
• Add support for OpenHarmony targets (*-unknown-linux-ohos).
  @​hiyms

Changed

• Cache allocation granularity on Windows to prevent repeated syscalls.
  @​mat-gas

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • At any time (no schedule defined)
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

1 warning, 1 note

⚠️ 120 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

ℹ️ 1 benchmark has no flamegraph

The flamegraph wasn't generated: most of the time was spent in runtime internals, which would leave nothing useful to analyze.

See affected benchmarks

✅ 401 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 70 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing renovate/memmap2-0.x-lockfile (043ccef) with main (1d6ca65)²}

Footnotes

1. 70 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (0776385) during the generation of this report, so 1d6ca65 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[cakebaker]

@xtqqczze done