[xtqqczze]

Closes #15339.
Closes #15362.

RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 cargo clippy -q -Zbuild-std=std,panic_abort -p uucore --all-targets --no-default-features --target=powerpc64-ibm-aix --target=i686-linux-android --target=x86_64-linux-android --target=x86_64-pc-cygwin --target=aarch64-apple-darwin --target=x86_64-unknown-dragonfly --target=x86_64-unknown-freebsd --target=x86_64-unknown-haiku --target=x86_64-unknown-hurd-gnu --target=aarch64-unknown-illumos --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --target=i686-unknown-netbsd --target=x86_64-unknown-netbsd --target=x86_64-unknown-openbsd --target=x86_64-unknown-redox --target=x86_64-pc-solaris --target=wasm32-wasip1 --target=x86_64-pc-windows-gnu

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

1 warning, 1 note

⚠️ 119 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

ℹ️ 1 benchmark has no flamegraph

The flamegraph wasn't generated: most of the time was spent in runtime internals, which would leave nothing useful to analyze.

See affected benchmarks

✅ 401 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 70 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing xtqqczze:GH15339 (5ff676b) with main (366c18c)}

Footnotes

1. 70 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[codspeed]

Unable to generate the performance report

There was an internal error while processing the run's data. We're working on fixing the issue. Feel free to contact us at support@codspeed.io or on Discord if the issue persists.