Skip to content

Correct retry-history and dedicated-endpoint guidance on the open-weight provider pages - #5589

Merged
Duncanma merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
dabh/open-weight-provider-page-fixes
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

Duncanma merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
dabh/open-weight-provider-page-fixes

Conversation

@DABH

@DABH DABH commented Oct 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to the two review comments on #5574 (Copilot, low severity), as promised to the Docs team.

  • Event History and retries (all three pages): the retry paragraph claimed every attempt and its failure are in Event History. Per the ActivityTaskStarted reference, the Event is written when the Activity closes and reflects the last attempt, so the paragraph now says Event History records the result, attempt count, and last failure, and points at Worker logs and the pending Activity's last failure for individual attempts. This matches the wording on the OpenRouter page.
  • Dedicated endpoints (Baseten, Together AI): the sample's baseten/ and together/ prefixes only reach the shared endpoints. The pages now say to add a PROVIDERS entry with a distinct name and the dedicated base URL, and to use that prefix in the model name.

Prose-only; no snippet changes. vale --config .vale-ci.ini is clean on all three pages.

…ght provider pages

Follow-up to review comments on #5574. Event History records an
Activity's result, attempt count, and last failure, not every attempt,
so the retry paragraph now says so and points at Worker logs and the
pending Activity's last failure for individual attempts. The Baseten and
Together AI pages now say explicitly that the sample's provider prefix
only reaches the shared endpoint, and that a dedicated deployment needs
its own PROVIDERS entry with a distinct name and base URL.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
temporal-documentation Ready Ready Preview Oct 28, 2026 6:19pm UTC

Request Review

@DABH
DABH requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2026 00:43
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 27, 2026 00:43

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📖 Docs PR preview links

@Duncanma
Duncanma enabled auto-merge (squash) October 28, 2026 18:16
@Duncanma
Duncanma merged commit 22651bb into main Oct 28, 2026
19 checks passed
@Duncanma
Duncanma deleted the dabh/open-weight-provider-page-fixes branch October 28, 2026 18:19

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — d4e93cfb Deployed Oct 28, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants