Repository navigation
fix: use correct path for wazuh-ansible role - #2581
jackhodgkiss wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configuration
You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info
📜 Recent review details
📝 Walkthrough
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to
|
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0… |
| Linked Issues check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|
Appears to mismatch between linting and what works in kayobe which is probably how the error was introduced in the first place. |
|
@jackhodgkiss Is there a way we can keep the lint jobs happy? |
|
Happy Friday @jackhodgkiss, this is a friendly reminder that this PR is waiting for your changes or response. Please take a look when you have a moment! Note: Once your changes are ready, remove the |
I can investigate however the linting isn't useful if it breaks actually functionality. |
Signed-off-by: Jack Hodgkiss <jack@stackhpc.com>
473fffe to
6742058
Compare
So are the linters actually incorrect here? You can ignore the file if needed. We've done that in the past for vault-related playbooks |
No description provided.