Repository navigation
test: verify Action v0.1 core-ref with synthetic ASCII rule - #46
kentwelcome wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kent Huang <kent@infuseai.io>
Independent AI review — round 1Reviewed base a5dacb0 and complete one-file patch, committed unchanged as ce74a3f with DCO sign-off. WorkflowCorrectness: APPROVE. No material findings, decisions, or optional suggestions. ASCII-only response rule preserves existing record-access and side-effect restrictions; this is a disposable verification fixture, not intended for merge. No permanent mechanisms or unauthorized scope added. Primary verification: git diff --check passed. Reviewer was read-only. No model calls or dispatch performed; live Action verification remains pending explicit approval. |
|
Closing to replace this with a test PR branched from and targeting ci/dogfood-action-core-ref, as requested. No live verification was run. |
|
Replacement: #47, based on and targeting ci/dogfood-action-core-ref. |
Disposable verification PR — do not merge
Adds an ASCII-only response rule to the existing synthetic shop fixture. No customer data or real side effects. The e2e path is excluded from automatic dogfood triggers.
Purpose
Verify the updated workflow in #45 against a small instruction change, without mixing workflow code into the comparison.
Pending live verification
User selected PRs only. No model calls or manual workflow dispatch have been authorized or performed.
When explicitly approved, dispatch Behavior Diff from ref ci/dogfood-action-core-ref (not main), with this PR number, its exact current head SHA, file e2e/demo-ascii-response/project/AGENTS.md, and fast=true. Do not use /behavior-diff comments before #45 merges: those run the default-branch workflow.
Expected checks: prepare freezes the selected workflow SHA as core_revision; run installs that SHA; result and comment identify the same core; report compares the synthetic rule with one trial per side. Treat changed behavior as observed evidence, not a guaranteed result. Public artifacts/comments and provider model cost require approval.
Verification
Independent read-only AI reviewer: APPROVE, no material findings, decisions or suggestions. Complete one-file diff reviewed; existing record-access and side-effect restrictions remain. git diff --check passed. Runtime behavior not yet verified.