Skip to content

Still experimental? #7

Closed
Closed

Description

@dmdabbs

Do you still consider this experimental?

Activity

  1. reschke commented on Nov 14, 2023

    @reschke
    Owner

    Good question.

    I believe the code is stable. That said, I'd like to see some feedback on the API for freezing it.

    Also, I'm in the process of implementing the new displaystring type.

    Does this answer your question?

  2. dmdabbs commented on Jan 29, 2024

    @dmdabbs
    Author

    Yes, it did. Thank you, and apologies for the delayed reply.
    Speaking of displaystring, a JavaScript implemention I starred, but have not yet experimented with, just implemented it:
    https://github.com/badgateway/structured-headers

  3. reschke commented on Jan 29, 2024

    @reschke
    Owner

    You can already experiment with the displaystring support if you want; there's a feature branch for it.

  4. paulmanta commented on Apr 4, 2026

    @paulmanta

    Copy-pasting my impressions of the API from #19 (comment):

    It's good if you intend this to be a lower level parser and serializer.

    In my case, I needed a more declarative API and I've defined some Jackson-style annotations that you apply to class fields to indicate header names and param names. Your library is used in the annotation processor for the actual parsing and serializing.

  5. reschke commented on Aug 20, 2026

    @reschke
    Owner

    @paulmanta - I have "decided" that I won't make any breaking API changes (famous last words). The next release will be an OSGi bundle with proper semantic versioning (see #26).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions