[UXD Spike] UX Designs that support all acceptable/valid competency criteria combinations. #732

Activity

1. thelmick-unicon

   added this to Competency Criteria and Student Progresson Aug 18, 2026
2. github-project-automation

   moved this to Needs additional details in Competency Criteria and Student Progresson Aug 18, 2026
3. thelmick-unicon

   added a parent issue on Aug 18, 2026

   • [EPIC-SP] View Competency Criteria Gradeable Subsections #730
4. jmakowski1123

   added this to Learning Pathwayson Aug 25, 2026
5. github-project-automation

   moved this to Todo in Learning Pathwayson Aug 25, 2026
6. jmakowski1123

   added this to Learning Pathwaysand CBE and Skills Forward Roadmap - High Level and removed this from Learning Pathwayson Aug 25, 2026
7. github-project-automation

   moved this to Todo in CBE and Skills Forward Roadmap - High Levelon Aug 26, 2026
8. jmakowski1123

   removed this from CBE and Skills Forward Roadmap - High Levelon Aug 26, 2026
9. mgwozdz-unicon

   self-assigned this

   on Sep 4, 2026
10. thelmick-unicon

    changed the title [-][Placeholder - FE] UX Designs that support all acceptable/valid competency criteria combinations.[/-] [+][UXD Spike] UX Designs that support all acceptable/valid competency criteria combinations.[/+] on Sep 10, 2026
11. github-project-automation

    added this to Learning Pathwayson Sep 10, 2026
12. mgwozdz-unicon commented on Sep 16, 2026

    

    mgwozdz-unicon

    on Sep 16, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    @illiphilli Please refer to the documentation here in creating these final UX Designs: #731
13. mgwozdz-unicon

    assigned

    illiphilli

    and unassigned

    mgwozdz-unicon

    on Sep 16, 2026
14. jmakowski1123

    removed this from Learning Pathwayson Oct 9, 2026
15. mgwozdz-unicon

    moved this from Needs additional details to Drafting in Competency Criteria and Student Progresson Oct 15, 2026
16. illiphilli

    moved this from Drafting to In Progress in Competency Criteria and Student Progresson Oct 15, 2026
17. illiphilli commented on Oct 15, 2026

    

    illiphilli

    on Oct 15, 2026

    Last edited by illiphilli

    More actions

    @jmakowski1123 @mgwozdz-unicon designs are ready for every scenario in #731. I checked the five Reduced Scope frames against Mary's list and added a Criteria combinations section for the gaps.

    Figma: Criteria combinations section · existing frames: Landing, Six Deep

    Already covered by the Reduced Scope frames

    • One group, one rule, one or more subsections: Landing (Evaluation; Analysis)
    • Leaf competency with its own criteria: Landing (every sub-competency)
    • Parent demonstrated only through its sub-competencies: Landing (Critical Thinking)
    • Three or more levels deep: Six Deep. Its breadcrumbs now list the ancestors (Level 1 to Level 4) per [FE] Build cards displaying Competency Criteria on the Course Progress page #734, and the extra slashes are gone.
    • Competency-level states: Landing (Demonstrated, Partially Attempted, Available; never Not Demonstrated)

    New frames that follow #734 as written

    1. One group, two thresholds, any one is enough
    2. One group, two thresholds, all required. It also shows Partially Attempted on a subsection row, which [ARCH] Document all acceptable/valid competency criteria combinations that need to be displayed. #731 lists. Per Mary's 9/1 note on [UXD Spike] Confirm what the Competency Status values should be, how they will be determined, and what iconography or other accessible means will be used with their display. #768, today's pass/fail rule can't produce it, so the row only matters if a future rule allows partial credit.
    3. Two groups joined by OR, with no group labels
    4. Parent with its own criteria and sub-competencies with criteria

    9. One subsection in two competencies, same grade, different statuses
    10. One subsection twice in one competency, at two thresholds

    These answer two of #731's open design questions:

    • Unlabeled groups (question 2): the AND/OR separator between groups, plus each group's own line (frame 3).
    • Different thresholds (question 3): one group line, then a rule line per threshold (frames 1 and 2), so they don't read as an error.

    Proposals that need a decision

    The italic copy in these frames is proposed. It's marked in Dev Mode.

    5. Demonstrated in another course run: the pills show the instance-wide status, with "Demonstrated in another course. Assignments here still count toward it."
    6. Sub-competency that can't be earned: a closing line names the sub-competency with no assignments, which explains a Partially Attempted heading over all-Demonstrated rows.
    7. Archived sub-competency with a recorded status: the tag keeps its recorded status, with "Archived" and no assignments.
    8. This course covers only some sub-competencies: "2 more Communication sub-competencies are assessed in other courses."

    @mgwozdz-unicon three questions on these:

    • Question 1 (unearnable or archived): should the learner see frames 6 and 7, or should those tags stay hidden? And does an archived child still count toward its parent's roll-up?
    • Cross-run status: [ARCH] Document all acceptable/valid competency criteria combinations that need to be displayed. #731 says the status must reflect the instance-wide value, but [FE] Display Competency Statuses for Learner in Course #740's known limitations say a masked competency can read "Available" here and "Demonstrated" elsewhere. Which wins? Frame 5 assumes [ARCH] Document all acceptable/valid competency criteria combinations that need to be displayed. #731.
    • Data: frames 5 and 8 need to know that a status came from another course, and how many sub-competencies have criteria elsewhere. Can [BE] GET Competency Criteria for Course #733 or [BE] GET Competency Statuses for Learner in Course #738 return that? If not, I'll drop those lines.

    @jmakowski1123 please review frames 1–4, 9 and 10 for approval. Frames 5–8 can follow once Mary has answered.
18. mgwozdz-unicon

    moved this from In Progress to Drafting in Competency Criteria and Student Progresson Oct 21, 2026
19. illiphilli commented on Oct 22, 2026

    

    illiphilli

    on Oct 22, 2026

    More actions

    @mgwozdz-unicon @jmakowski1123 recording yesterday's check-in on the Criteria combinations section, plus proposed answers to what's still open.

    Decided 10/20

    • Cross-run status: [ARCH] Document all acceptable/valid competency criteria combinations that need to be displayed. #731 wins over [FE] Display Competency Statuses for Learner in Course #740's known limitation. If a learner has demonstrated a competency in another course, this course shows it as Demonstrated. As Dave put it, the learner has earned it, so the page has to reflect it.
    • Frame 5, Demonstrated in another course: "Assignments here still count toward it" is gone, because once a competency is demonstrated there's nothing left to count toward. The new copy: "Demonstrated in [course name]. You can still complete these assignments, but they aren't required." The course name links to that course and opens in a new tab. Mary will have the back end return which course it was demonstrated in.

    Removed

    • Frame 4 (parent with its own criteria and sub-competencies with criteria) can't happen. Once a subsection is associated with a competency, [BE] Add Competency hierarchy dominance validation to Competency Criteria Creation #666 blocks associating that competency's ancestors or descendants with anything in the same course. I've marked the frame "Not valid ([BE] Add Competency hierarchy dominance validation to Competency Criteria Creation #666)" so the link above still works, but it shouldn't be built. "Parent demonstrated only through its sub-competencies" is still covered by Landing (Critical Thinking).

    Proposed

    • Frames 6 and 7 (can't be earned, archived): show both to learners. Hiding them makes a Partially Attempted heading over all-Demonstrated rows look like a bug. An archived sub-competency keeps its recorded status. @mgwozdz-unicon does it still count toward its parent's roll-up? I'd say yes, since the status was earned.
    • Frame 8 (this course covers only some sub-competencies): drop the "N more sub-competencies are assessed in other courses" line for MVP. Mary wasn't sure the back end can tell, and the line isn't needed to read the card. I'll restore it if [BE] GET Competency Criteria for Course #733 or [BE] GET Competency Statuses for Learner in Course #738 can return the count.

    For approval
    @jmakowski1123 please approve frames 1–3, 9 and 10 (these follow #734 as written), and frame 5 with the new copy. Per the workflow agreed 10/20, Mary can make the final call on frames 6–8 if they're too in the weeds.
20. illiphilli

    moved this from Drafting to In Progress in Competency Criteria and Student Progresson Oct 23, 2026