Skip to content

fix: check release architectures with native lipo syntax - #101

Merged
steipete merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci-release-lipo-fix
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

steipete merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci-release-lipo-fix

Conversation

@steipete

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fixes the signing-stage architecture check exposed by the first Swabble merged-main dry run. lipo requires the input before -verify_arch and checks one architecture per invocation, so validate the two universal slices individually before signing. The same correction applies to both macOS CLI pipelines.

Adds a fast native CI regression fixture: compile arm64 and x86_64 Mach-O objects, run the actual workflow gate against their universal file, and require rejection of a thin file. The fixture uses no signing credentials and executes no candidate binary. Native fixture and shell/workflow lint passed; independent review through P2 is clean. No release or version tag is created.

@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented Oct 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦞👀
ClawSweeper picked this up.

Pull request received. I will update this pull request when review starts.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-16T23:13:25.679535Z 39646eb PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@steipete
steipete merged commit e37ab9a into main Oct 16, 2026
7 checks passed
@steipete
steipete deleted the ci-release-lipo-fix branch October 16, 2026 23:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant