Skip to content

ci(lint): lower the tracked lint baseline to the current count - #6850

Merged
AndyScherzinger merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/noid/update-lint-baseline
Oct 11, 2026
Merged

AndyScherzinger merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/noid/update-lint-baseline

Conversation

@AndyScherzinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

scripts/analysis/lint-results.txt still records 18 errors, while lint now reports 15 against the same 138 warnings — see the Codacy comment on #6749.

This matters beyond bookkeeping. scripts/analysis/lint-up.rb reads the count from this file, compares each run against it, and only rewrites it when the count has dropped. A baseline sitting above the real figure is slack: three errors can come back before anything fails, and the next genuine reduction is measured from the wrong starting point.

Only the number changes; the file keeps its generated header and its format, so the script's own write-back on the next reduction looks exactly the same.

🖼️ Screenshots

No user-visible change.

🚧 TODO

  • ...

🏁 Checklist

  • ⛑️ Tests (unit and/or integration) are included or not needed
  • 🔖 Capability is checked or not needed
  • 🔙 Backport requests are created or not needed: /backport to stable-xx.x
  • 📅 Milestone is set
  • 🌸 PR title is meaningful (if it should be in the changelog: is it meaningful to users?)

🤖 AI (if applicable)

  • The content of this PR was partly or fully generated using AI

The tracked baseline still claims 18 errors, while lint now reports 15
for the same 138 warnings. lint-up.rb compares each run against this
file and only rewrites it when a count drops, so a baseline left above
the real figure lets three errors come back without anything failing.

Assisted-by: Claude Code:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Andy Scherzinger <info@andy-scherzinger.de>
@AndyScherzinger AndyScherzinger added the 3. to review Waiting for reviews label Oct 10, 2026
@AndyScherzinger AndyScherzinger self-assigned this Oct 10, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 23 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used all 4 included reviews currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 517892f5-ad6f-41a0-ad97-8a720ec97738

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 611b35e and f654e56.


📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/analysis/lint-results.txt

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AndyScherzinger AndyScherzinger added this to the 25.1.0 milestone Oct 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Codacy

Lint

TypemasterPR
Warnings138138
Errors1815

SpotBugs

CategoryBaseNew
Bad practice77
Correctness1111
Dodgy code4040
Internationalization33
Malicious code vulnerability33
Performance88
Security1111
Total8383

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📱 QA build

Download app-qa-debug.apk
QR code Open the QR code for this download
Commit f654e56
Version 6850
Available until 7 days after this build

The QA build installs alongside a released Nextcloud app, so you can keep
using your existing install while testing.

Downloading the file requires a GitHub account, so open this link on the
device you want to test on, or transfer the APK to it.

@AndyScherzinger
AndyScherzinger merged commit cd69706 into master Oct 11, 2026
20 of 22 checks passed
@AndyScherzinger
AndyScherzinger deleted the ci/noid/update-lint-baseline branch October 11, 2026 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to review Waiting for reviews AI assisted

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant