Repository navigation
Conversation
Three m0 quests from a comparison with pstack and a scan of the maintainer's typed messages: a prose rule that passing checks is not verification, a command that prints typed messages, and a recurring audit that turns repeated mistakes into follow-up quests. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Plans three m0 quests from a comparison of Quest with pstack and a scan of the maintainer's typed messages (Claude Code and Codex, 2026-10-26 to 2026-11-10).
quest/m0/real-surface.md(S): one prose rule inquest contextthat passing checks is not verification. Only moq-dev/moq.pro carries it today.quest/m0/typed-messages.md(M): aquestcommand that prints only the messages a person typed, so an audit stops rebuilding the extraction.quest/m0/mistake-audit.md(L): a weekly recurring audit that groups repeated mistakes into classes and adds a follow-up quest per class. It requires the command, and its Plan holds the scan as its baseline.Evidence: since 2026-11-06, 65 of 416 merged moq-dev/moq PRs and 14 of 80 merged moq-dev/quest PRs carry "Caused by" in the body (a phrase search, so approximate). The scan was the third hand-run transcript audit in six days.
Decisions
Chosen options marked ✅; each is also in its quest's Plan.
## Validationrecord thatquest readyrefuses without, which the agent recommended; a reviewer finding only).## Waitingitem (rejected: each milestone; each release cut).Agent's choices, for review:
AGENTS.md,CONTRIBUTING.md, or skill; each class becomes a follow-up quest for the maintainer's pick.Follow-ups
None.
Impact
Public API: none. Wire: none. Only
quest/changes.Validation
quest checkpasses on the tree (36 documents).quest gate just checkdid not run: see Waiting.just testdid not run: no code changed.Waiting
quest gate just checkgets room. Its last attempt waited two hours without starting, behind another session's gated mutation campaign (1-minute load 36 on 24 CPUs at the last look). An earlier attempt did start and failed only because this checkout had no dependencies installed, whichjust installfixed. Check by running it in this branch, then run/quest-review.Models
Size: M
Implementer: Claude Code, claude-fable-5-2, high effort
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
(Written by Claude Fable 5 with high)