[kixelated]

This is a follow-up of moq-dev/quest#517 (Rules load once). That PR installs a user-level SessionStart hook that gives Claude Code the always-on rules, but gives Codex nothing. Its agent proposed Codex parity once Single-pass review settled whether quest review's Codex sessions load user hooks.

That's settled: moq-dev/quest#514 runs Codex reviews with --ignore-user-config. The work goes into Mechanical rules become checks, which already plans Codex hooks.json entries through quest setup, rather than into a new quest. The quest asks the implementer to confirm in a review transcript that the hook stays out of reviews.

Models

Size: XS
Implementer: Claude Code, claude-opus-5-5, high effort

Validation

quest check: 77 documents ok.

Review

• Skipped by the author: this is a single plan bullet with no code, so it is too trivial to need a review.
• Head: 6f0b2a3

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5 with high effort)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[pullfrog]

  ^{｜ Review this ➔}

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 35 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 725104e6-0d97-4b56-9381-c6295c493ceb

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b69ad1 and 6f0b2a3.

Files selected for processing: 1

• quest/m0/token-waste/rule-checks.md

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

[kixelated]

Automated review by review (OpenAI)

Reviewed head: 6f0b2a3

No actionable findings in this eight-line plan addition (quest/m0/token-waste/rule-checks.md:33–40). Keeping Codex rule injection with the existing hook work is a coherent direction. The plan explicitly covers compaction, context capacity, hook trust, and verifying that review sessions do not load the hook.

Limits: GitHub-only static review of the change, related plans, #517's hook implementation, and the current review launcher. The launcher does pass --ignore-user-config, but that alone does not establish hook isolation; the requested transcript check remains necessary during implementation. No CLI execution or tests were run. Rechecked that this PR is open, non-draft, on the same head, with no prior submitted reviews before posting.