Repository navigation
fix(server): answer a known method with invalid params with -32602 #1375
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
talhayme
wants to merge
4
commits into
modelcontextprotocol:main
Choose a base branch
from
talhayme:fix/1347-invalid-params-for-known-method
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
569e864
fix(server): answer a known method with invalid params with -32602
talhayme 0c01e98
fix(server): keep methods this lifecycle does not serve as -32601
talhayme 201a516
fix(server): tell invalid params from unknown methods at deserialization
talhayme 4b8df13
fix(model): keep the derived name of ClientRequest::deserialize's typ…
talhayme File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heads-up for the rebase:
mainnow gatesskills/get/skills/listandresources/directory/readinside their match arms withvalidate_skills_capability. Those arms run after this pre-check. On a rebased branch, with a server that doesn't declare the skills extension (ordirectoryRead):skills/getwith malformed params →-32602(expected-32601)resources/directory/readwith malformed params →-32602(expected-32601)Moving the skills and
directoryReadchecks in here, next to the tasks check, gives-32601for both, and regression tests for both pass with it.skills/listisn't affected: a bad cursor object still gets-32601.Every capability-gated method added later will need the same treatment. A table-driven test would catch the next one: for each gated method, turn its capability off, send malformed params, and assert
-32601.