Repository navigation
AKS Windows Server 2022: RSTs to a deleted pod's IP loop between the synthetic NIC and the accelerated networking VF, pinning cores at high DPC #655
Description
Please fill out all the sections below for bug issues, otherwise it'll be closed as it won't be actionable for us to address.
Describe the bug
On AKS Windows Server 2022 nodes, after a pod is torn down while it holds outbound TCP connections to an in-cluster LoadBalancer VIP, the host gets stuck forwarding TCP RST packets addressed to the dead pod's IP. The packets enter on the synthetic Hyper-V adapter and are sent straight back out on the accelerated networking VF, indefinitely: 18,000–183,000 packets/sec of ~60-byte packets. They never reach any container.
The kernel DPC work this generates pins specific cores at 25–96%, and every workload on the node slows 1.5x–13x. In our fleet 18 of 138 Windows nodes were in this state at once after a weekend of redeployments. We have seen this class of Windows-node degradation for several years and have worked around it by rotating to fresh nodes on every release.
The dead pod's IP is still present as an ipConfiguration on the node's Azure NIC (Azure CNI node-subnet preallocation), but HNS has no endpoint for it. Only replacing the node has cleared it so far.
To Reproduce
We cannot reproduce it on demand: it is not every teardown, and the same node has had pods torn down with no loop afterwards. The sequence we observed each time:
- An AKS cluster with Windows Server 2022 nodes, Azure CNI (node subnet, IPs preallocated on the node NIC), accelerated networking enabled.
- An ingress controller (ingress-nginx, on Linux nodes) exposed as an internal
type: LoadBalancerService,externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster,ipMode: VIP. - Windows pods (IIS / .NET) calling other in-cluster services through hostnames that CoreDNS resolves to that LB VIP, so each Windows pod holds keep-alive HTTPS client connections to
<LB_VIP>:443. - One of those pods goes away while its connections are open. We saw it after either of:
- a
rollout restart/ redeploy that moves the pod to another node; - a node reboot with the pod still scheduled, where the pod came back with a new IP and the old IP began looping.
- a
- On the original node, RST,ACK packets from
<LB_VIP>:443to<DEAD_POD_IP>:<ephemeral ports>start circulating, with the receive rate on the synthetic adapter equal to the send rate on the VF. They continue until the node is replaced.
Evidence from an affected node.
Packet counters, 3 × 2 s samples:
\network interface(microsoft hyper-v network adapter _2)\packets received/sec = 177,859
\network interface(mellanox connectx-4 lx virtual ethernet adapter)\packets sent/sec = 177,990
Hyper-V Virtual Switch ext pkts/s = ~336,000
An unaffected node in the same pool reads 27–28 packets/sec.
Per-core DPC on an 8-core node:
cpu 0 dpc% 91.4 cpu 2 dpc% 72.0 cpu 4 dpc% 85.5 cpu 6 dpc% 67.0
cpu 1,3,5,7 dpc% 0.0 _total dpc% 39.5 dpcq/s 97,282
No process accounts for this CPU.
pktmon capture, 8 s, headers only:
<LB_VIP>:443 > <DEAD_POD_IP>:51198 Flags [R.] n=25,739
<LB_VIP>:443 > <DEAD_POD_IP>:51222 Flags [R.] n=25,388
<LB_VIP>:443 > <DEAD_POD_IP>:51197 Flags [R.] n=25,388
... 7 flows, 145,294 packets in 8 s
We confirmed the same pattern on a second cluster: 61,224 packets in 5 s to one dead IP.
<DEAD_POD_IP>has no pod and no HNS endpoint (Get-HnsEndpoint).- It is still listed in the node NIC's ipConfigurations.
- Pod inventory shows its last owner was a pod on that same node, torn down at the times above.
Expected behavior
A packet arriving for a NIC-owned secondary IP that has no HNS endpoint behind it should be dropped, or answered once, by the host. Instead it is forwarded back out through the VF, apparently without decrementing TTL, delivered back to the same node by Azure, and looped indefinitely.
Configuration:
- Edition: Windows Server 2022 (AKS node image
AKSWindows-2022-containerd-20348.5139.260513, OS build 10.0.20348.5139) - Base Image being used: Windows Server Core,
mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/framework/aspnet:4.8.1-windowsservercore-ltsc2022(container OS 10.0.20348.5622) - Container engine: containerd (AKS), kubelet v1.35.4
- Container Engine version: containerd 1.7.20+azure
Also relevant:
- Network: Azure CNI node subnet; maxPods 250, so 251 ipConfigurations per NIC
- Accelerated networking: enabled; Mellanox ConnectX-4 Lx Virtual Ethernet Adapter, driver 23.4.26054.1
- VM sizes affected: Standard_D8d_v4, Standard_E8as_v4, Standard_F16s_v2
Additional context
- Impact: IIS request latency for pods on affected nodes went from p50 ~250 ms to ~2,700 ms. Two replicas of one deployment, on an affected and an unaffected node, measured 2,769 ms and 253 ms p50 over the same 6 hours. Slowdown correlated with node DPC (r ≈ 0.78 across 12 workloads).
- Normal on affected nodes: disk latency (~0.2 ms), Defender and Windows Update activity, the System event log, HNS network and endpoint counts, kubelet, containerd and kube-proxy state. The node image is identical to healthy nodes.
- Not reproduced elsewhere: a smaller, low-traffic cluster with the same pod churn and node reuse (node image 20348.5020) shows no loop.
- Questions:
- Is this a known HNS / VFP / accelerated networking defect, and is there a fix in a newer Windows Server 2022 or 2025 node image?
- Is there a supported way to clear an affected node without replacing it, e.g. an
hnsdiag/vfpctrlaction or releasing the stale IP? - Is there a supported configuration that prevents it, such as a CNI setting, VFP policy, or kube-proxy flag (DSR)?
- Does Azure CNI Overlay on Windows avoid it, given pod IPs would no longer be NIC ipConfigurations?
- Possibly related: HNS endpoints are staying as stale even after pods are terminated #631 (stale HNS endpoints after pod deletion); [BUG] Frequent intermittent network issues on AKS windows nodes Azure/AKS#5483 (intermittent Windows pod networking failures, closed without root cause).
- Our current workaround: replace affected nodes, and alert on node
% DPC Time> 2% (any core > 15%) or synthetic-NIC receive > 5,000 pps with VF send within 10% of it.
Fullpktmon --comp allcaptures,collectlogs.ps1output and the NIC ipConfiguration listing are available on request.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Oct 5, 2026
Thank you for creating an Issue. Please note that GitHub is not an official channel for Microsoft support requests. To create an official support request, please open a ticket here. Microsoft and the GitHub Community strive to provide a best effort in answering questions and supporting Issues on GitHub.
richshadman commentedon Oct 5, 2026
Update: full component capture on an affected node
We took a
pktmon start --capture --comp allcapture (6 s, filtered to the stale pod IP) on a node that was still looping, pluscollectlogs.ps1output.The same packets circulate indefinitely; nothing generates new ones.
The reset appears to be generated on the Windows side.
Per-component counters: no component drops anything, and all drop counters read 0.
Packets enter on the synthetic NetVsc path and leave through the VF, and none come back in through the VF.
HNS has no endpoint for the IP, yet it is still one of the node NIC's ipConfigurations.
The capture ETL, HNS endpoint/network/policy dumps, VFP port list and
collectlogs.ps1output are available on request.richshadman commentedon Oct 5, 2026
Update: restarting HNS clears the loop; restarting the VF does not
We tested mitigations on two looping nodes in a non-customer cluster. The nodes run the same image and versions as the original report:
AKSWindows-2022-containerd-20348.5139.260513, containerd 1.7.20, kubelet v1.35.4, accelerated networking with a Mellanox ConnectX-4 Lx VF. Each node was its own baseline, and the other looping node served as the control.Restart-NetAdapteron the Mellanox VFRestart-Service hns -Force, node ARestart-Service hns -Force, node BA VF reset does not clear the loop, but an HNS restart clears it within seconds. That suggests the forwarding state lives in the rules HNS programs into the virtual switch (VFP), not in the NIC. Our inference is that on restart HNS reprograms VFP from its live endpoint list, and the torn-down pod's IP is absent from that list, so the stale state is not rebuilt. We would appreciate confirmation, or a correction, from the HNS/VFP side.
Fresh nodes are not immune
Our original assumption was that only nodes reused across deployments were affected. That is not the case.
So rotating onto fresh nodes each release lowers the odds, but does not prevent the loop.
Additional capture detail
A full
pktmon --comp allcapture filtered to one dead pod IP recorded 465,230 events. Every packet carried TTL 128 and IP ID 1, with zero drops reported by any component. The packets are TCP RST,ACK from the in-cluster ingress load balancer VIP on 443 to the dead pod's ephemeral ports. Because the TTL is never decremented, the packets are being switched rather than routed, and TTL 128 suggests the resets are generated on the Windows host rather than by the Linux ingress pods. Both points are inference. The pktmon ETL with counters, HNS endpoint/network/policy JSON, the VFP port list andcollectlogs.ps1output are available on request.Mitigation we are deploying
A HostProcess DaemonSet on every Windows node that:
Packets Received/secand the VF'sPackets Sent/secevery 30 s;Restart-Service hns -Force, waits 60 s and re-measures;This remediates the symptom, not the cause.
Questions
smiezah-msft commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Thanks for the detailed report and all the additional investigation. There’s a lot of useful diagnostic information here, particularly around the packet path and the difference in behavior between restarting the VF and restarting HNS.
We’ll need to investigate further to determine the underlying cause. If possible, please share the diagnostic artifacts you mentioned, including the full pktmon capture, HNS/VFP state, and collectlogs.ps1 output. These should help with narrowing down the behavior.
richshadman commentedon Oct 15, 2026
I will post it this evening once i have the logs scrubbed and zipped.
Regarding the open ended questions on my last post, 2 is the most pertinent as we have a daemonset deployed right now monitoring for this and restarting hns when it passes a threshold of events (currently only monitoring on prod but restarting on our non prod clusters - will switch it when we get confirmation on question 2 above that it is a safe approach).
richshadman commentedon Oct 15, 2026
Thanks for picking this up. Two attachments, plus a finding from today that changes the picture.
Attachments (all host names, workload names and addresses are pseudonymised, consistently across both files and the text below):
wincontainers-655-raw-diagnostics.zip- captured today from a node that was looping at the time: apktmon start --capture --comp allcapture filtered to the looped IP (pcapng sample of 73,842 packets; IPv4 headers rewritten and checksums recomputed),Get-HnsNetwork/Get-HnsEndpoint/Get-HnsPolicyListJSON,vfpctrlport list and spaces,collectlogs.ps1text output, and HNS / VmSwitch / Hyper-V Compute / System event logs as text. The raw ETL could not be anonymised; we can share it privately if you need it.wincontainers-655-evidence.zip- the processed evidence behind the earlier comments (per-core DPC, NIC rates, pktmon summaries, the HNS-restart and VF-restart tests).Both contain a README with the pseudonym scheme and a timeline.
New: what keeps feeding the loop, and why restarting HNS sometimes does not hold
Edited: an earlier version of this comment attributed the seed packets to the Azure load balancer's idle-timeout reset. That was wrong; see the third bullet.
On today's node an HNS restart cleared the loop within seconds, and it re-formed within a minute, twice. A component capture filtered to the looped IP showed:
10.102.191.0:443) to an ephemeral port on a dead pod IP (10.102.160.223), with exactly one distinct TCP sequence number per flow, circulating at roughly 5,000 times a second each.ipMode: VIP, so a pod's connection to the VIP is DNAT'd by the node's HNS load-balancer policy straight to an nginx pod and never passes through the Azure load balancer. Every RST carries TTL 128, where the Linux ingress nodes would send 64, and the nginx pods held no sockets to the dead IP by then. Our inference is that VFP / the HNS load-balancer policy expires the departed pod's NAT flows some minutes later and answers each with an RST addressed to the pod, sourced from the VIP.So restarting HNS does work, but only once no further RSTs can arrive. Inside that window the loop re-forms. We confirmed it on the same node: an HNS restart at 04:19 UTC, 75 minutes after its last application pod left, cleared the loop within 15 seconds (synthetic NIC receive fell from ~264k to ~1k packets/s, DPC from 26.5% to 0.1%) and it stayed clear. Our earlier HNS-restart tests held because the dead pods had been gone for days.
This sharpens the question we asked before. The host itself generates a reset for a connection of a deleted endpoint, addresses it to that endpoint's IP, and then forwards that packet out of the VF and straight back in on the synthetic path, indefinitely, with no TTL decrement and no drop.
Questions
For anyone else hitting this: we are changing our remediation DaemonSet to defer the HNS restart until about 38 minutes after the last pod left the node (a window measured empirically, not derived from a known timeout), rather than a fixed delay.
wincontainers-655-evidence.zip
wincontainers-655-raw-diagnostics.zip
richshadman commentedon Oct 15, 2026
One more data point: the loop is not specific to the Mellanox VF.
The same cluster has a node pool on
Standard_D8d_v5, whose accelerated-networking VF is the Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) rather than a Mellanox ConnectX-4 Lx. Two of its nine nodes were looping tonight, at about 148k and 101k packets/s against 26-56 packets/s on the other seven.A capture on one of them shows the same signature as the Mellanox nodes: RST,ACK from the ingress VIP (10.102.191.0:443) to ports on two dead pod IPs, neither of which has an HNS endpoint (60k and 26k packets in 5 s). The pods owning those IPs had left the node 5 days and 5.4 hours earlier, so one of these loops had been running for about 5 days. Restarting HNS cleared it (152,855 to 45 packets/s within 23 s).
Two differences from the Mellanox nodes:
So the forwarding behaviour is common to both VF types and is not a Mellanox driver issue. MANA hides the cost from the host CPU but still carries 100k+ packets/s of looping traffic.
Everything in it is measured. The IP is in its pseudonymised form, consistent with the earlier comment.
richshadman commentedon Oct 16, 2026
smiezah-msft - the most pressing question we have is this one currently:
Is restarting HNS a supported mitigation on a production AKS Windows node? Is there a better-scoped action, for example reprogramming a single port?Knowing this will allow us to move from just monitoring to resolving the issue automatically in our production clusters via the daemonset we have installed.