Skip to content

Keep each review in its own docs/Review.md - #97

Merged
kineticsystem merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
review-file
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

kineticsystem merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
review-file

Conversation

@kineticsystem

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Reviews move out of the architecture documents into a docs/Review.md beside each one.

  • ui/docs/Review.md, new: the Review section of ui/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md, moved unchanged, with its subsections as sections and a table of contents of its own. Its link to the rig's review, docs/ARCHITECTURE.md#review, pointed to a section that no longer exists, and now points to the rig's architecture document.
  • ui/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: without the review; its introduction links to Review.md.
  • .claude/CLAUDE.md: each part has its architecture document and, beside it, its review in docs/Review.md; the list of an architecture document's sections ends with Design Decisions and Trade-offs.

The modules get the same rule in their own pull requests, to merge first:

This pull request does not move the submodules; an "Update the modules" pull request does that once they are merged. No code changes.

Test plan

  • ui/docs/Review.md and ui/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md render on GitHub, and their links resolve.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…of the architecture documents

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@kineticsystem
kineticsystem merged commit bdd3961 into main Oct 16, 2026
16 checks passed
@kineticsystem
kineticsystem deleted the review-file branch October 16, 2026 11:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant