Repository navigation
tests: Use "no plan" style of TAP output - #778
Conversation
|
LGTM minus the JXL change in appstream as I said in the other thread. If you want this merged first, you can drop the JXL change. I'll have to do some changes to the code to make sure it stays PNG and release a new version. |
|
I moved the most important part of this for diagnosing #776 into #781. Because the number of tests in |
|
Are you going to rebase this? or should I take over? It's the last thing before the 1.4.12 release. |
|
This will need a rebase after #782 lands, but is otherwise ready (only look at the last commit). This also doesn't have to be a release blocker, skipping it until after 1.4.12 is completely fine. I've targeted |
Similar to flatpak/flatpak@b1fdf6c this makes it more obvious where the boundary between test-cases is, and similar to flatpak/flatpak#6794 it avoids needing to declare up-front how many tests we plan to run (which makes conflicts inevitable if we add more than one test to the same script). Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
|
Yep I am backporting it to 1.4.x |
tests: Use "no plan" style of TAP output
Similar to
flatpak/flatpak@b1fdf6c
this makes it more obvious where the boundary between test-cases is,
and similar to tests: Don't specify planned number of tests up-front flatpak#6794 it avoids
needing to declare up-front how many tests we plan to run (which makes
conflicts inevitable if we add more than one test to the same script).