Skip to content

[docs](k8s) Explain compute-storage decoupled scaling in dev and 4.x - #4632

Open
morningman wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
morningman:docs/issue-2370-cloud-scaling
Open

morningman wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
morningman:docs/issue-2370-cloud-scaling

Conversation

@morningman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Problem and change

The Kubernetes compute-storage decoupled deployment guide lists computeGroups.replicas but does not give users a complete scaling procedure. Add a linked scaling section to the compute-group configuration page in dev and 4.x, in English and Chinese. The requested scope is dev and 4.x only.

The guide covers adding/removing BE nodes, adding/removing complete compute groups, resource changes, FE scaling constraints, and completion checks. It explains Operator-managed BE decommission, the default non-decommission path and its image-dependent graceful flow, PVC cleanup during scale-in, and the different removal path when a whole compute-group entry is deleted.

Fixes #2370

Implementation evidence

Checked Doris branch-4.0, branch-4.1, and master, and the released Doris Operator 26.0.1 implementation rather than inferring behavior from the replica field:

Validation and self-review

  • git diff --check passed.
  • Compiled all eight changed Markdown files with the Docusaurus Markdown processor; front matter and fenced YAML parse successfully, including the explicit scaling anchor.
  • Checked new relative links and the scaling anchor across all four version/locale trees. The repository link linter reports 18 pre-existing missing anchors in the touched pages, all outside the added scaling instructions; no new internal-link errors were found.
  • The i18n checker found both requested language/version pairs. It emits informational reminders about 3.x, which is outside the requested scope.
  • Existing paths, navigation entries, and heading anchors are preserved. No site configuration or frontend code changes.
  • No Kubernetes scaling test or full site build was run. The procedures and cautions are based on the pinned implementation above; they do not promise interruption-free scale-in.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issue on docs 没有直观的说明,存算分离模式下的扩缩容操作

1 participant