Repository navigation
Conversation
Modernize deleted copy constructor and copy assignment. Mark cppcheck detected duplicate inherited update() method as fine. Cherry-pick: Only take WHB changes
… no side-effects can occur. Fix missing dereference in clearing pin reference.
Cherry-Pick: Only WHB
Fixes step 5/10 enable/disable
Changing mode from auto to manual would require the program to stop and just gives unneccesary warnings when trying it anyway
This is not an md file but a hal file
Note: isProgramRunning can not be used due to this is false when paused
* Update pendant.cc fixed old issue LinuxCNC#987 that wasn't fully patched few versions back some xhc-whb04b-x pendants send different key for one switch * Update pendant.h fixed old issue LinuxCNC#987 that wasn't fully patched few versions back some xhc-whb04b-x pendants send different key for one switch
Tested by overwriting incoming 0x1c codes by 0x9b in usb.cc
XhcWhb04b6Component should not even include libusb
As sugested by Finngineering
6f3e9bb to
d257628
Compare
grandixximo
left a comment
grandixximo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I read through this against 2.9 and master, and it matches the master code apart from the 64-bit HAL API changes. I think it is worth having in 2.9, mostly for the MPG => STEP/CON fix (7937593 on master): the backlog of wheel counts gathered in MPG mode could make the machine jump on the first tick after switching.
One thing a 2.9 user may notice: on 2.9 today -B never had any effect, so everyone got 5 and 10 mm at 60% and 100%. After this, without -B those positions give 1 mm. I think that is fine (it is the safe direction, the pendant shows 1 on the scale, and it matches the man page), but it may be worth a line in the release notes. The same goes for manual mode requests now depending on whb.halui.program.is-idle being connected; it is in the man page and the example config, so most setups have it.
LGTM, thanks!
Backport to 2.9 of these two PR's and 4 other commits needed for a clean back port:
#3810
#3897
Fixes: #4646
I had this back port on my git for a long time. If there will be another 2.9 release, it could be worth merging it. Any opinions?