Reconcile the remaining shipped-closure proof and prerequisite ledger #33

Acceptance Criteria

• Join the actual shipped schema/helper/format/alias closure, implemented conditional components, current SDK facts and remaining owners; separate C/I/V, auxiliary, host and decoder obligations.
• Assign every missing proof or external fact a source, next action and owner role. Do not qualify unused imported schemas or private engine alternatives merely to make an earlier gate look complete.

Blocking And Review Gates

• No direct internal issue prerequisite identified; this does not mean Ready or approved for implementation.

Use native blocked-by/blocking links for unconditional issue relationships. Conditional target gates are not universal blockers; link only the selected applicable path after its contract is frozen.

Shared Acceptance Requirements

Every implementation issue ships its own unit/conformance, failure, resource and privacy tests. A later integration issue does not postpone those checks. New untrusted decoders include generated hostile-input controls; changed hot paths include repeatable measurements. Use the existing engine, host services, validated config/push path and EdgeZero handler registration. Preserve privacy, authorization, cookie integrity, HTTPS/SSRF protections, deadlines, exact sent coverage, authoritative bidder/alias attribution and bounded work/storage. Standalone and embedded behavior share policy rather than fork implementations.

No issue may claim a missing capability from metadata import, compilation, observed allocations, a signed cookie, or a different artifact's old evidence. New public/configuration behavior requires its reviewed design before execution. No workload reduction, raised ceiling or replacement budget equation is implied. Bodies and evidence must not publish credentials, identifiers, raw consent, private provider addresses or customer configuration.

Technical Ownership

Sources: M7-R0 design/plan, ISSUES.md resource rows and schema qualification record.

Source Contracts

• Approved roadmap
• Product vision
• Issue ledger and qualification limitations
• Schema qualification record

Retired Ledger Proof Owners

#147 owns remaining existing configuration-extraction allocation/lifetime proof, coordinated with the new representation accounting in #130. #150 owns sealed source/candidate DTO/work/funding/deadline qualification; receipt admission and controlled-native integration already exist. Include these applicable closures in the reconciliation rather than reopening completed implementations or declaring unshipped schemas prerequisites. #148 separately audits ordinary Serde after lexical preflight; its existence is not evidence of an exploit.

Resource Proof Responsibilities

Responsible technical role: Auctioneer resource-reconciliation maintainer.

Next verification action: reconcile the discovery-derived executable/schema/helper/format/alias closure and existing conditional components, then verify that every remaining proof or external fact links to its responsible existing issue. Keep C, I and V, configuration, sealed DTO, ordinary Serde audit, auxiliary handoff, SDK bookkeeping, ingress, codec and combined-host obligations separate. No local assignee/action ledger is required.

Source: approved shared resource ownership contract, delivered for review in #162. This records responsibility and the next verification action, not completed proof, target qualification, changed workload limits or permission to close this issue.