Skip to content

fix: represent absent and empty creator and suffix explicitly - #1009

Draft
marcpaterno wants to merge 1 commit into
stack/concept-registry/05-translator-integrationfrom
represent-creator-and-suffix-state-explicitly
Draft

marcpaterno wants to merge 1 commit into
stack/concept-registry/05-translator-integrationfrom
represent-creator-and-suffix-state-explicitly

Conversation

@marcpaterno

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • Model an unqualified creator's plugin and an empty suffix as
    explicit empty values instead of invalid empty identifiers.
  • Make a product specification's creator optional; provider
    construction now requires a present creator.
  • Reject empty algorithm names, empty plugin components, and an empty
    configured module_label instead of accepting them silently.
  • Rename the default source creator from "[Source]" to "phlex_source",
    which is a valid name under the new parser.
  • Return borrowed string views from handle creator() and suffix()
    accessors.
  • Add tests for parsing, equality/hashing, exact product lookup,
    provider construction, and handle views.

Stack created with GitHub Stacks CLI • Give Feedback 💬

- Model an unqualified creator's plugin and an empty suffix as
  explicit empty values instead of invalid empty identifiers.
- Make a product specification's creator optional; provider
  construction now requires a present creator.
- Reject empty algorithm names, empty plugin components, and an empty
  configured module_label instead of accepting them silently.
- Rename the default source creator from "[Source]" to "phlex_source",
  which is a valid name under the new parser.
- Return borrowed string views from handle creator() and suffix()
  accessors.
- Add tests for parsing, equality/hashing, exact product lookup,
  provider construction, and handle views.
@marcpaterno
marcpaterno added this pull request to stack #1004 October 23, 2026 22:34
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant