Repository navigation
Update API docs - #278
Update API docs#278
Conversation
Document the Stats service, current bindings and maintenance configuration, and updated migration, testing, and deployment workflows. Clarify that Extensions v2 is authoritative and update Central Alerts migration guidance.
Reorganize the service README into shorter sections covering lifecycle, reads, authentication, limits, retention, and database migrations while preserving key API and operational guidance.
Update the repository guidelines to match the current codebase. Broaden the flat-service layout to list the narrow helper modules actually in use, and document the extensions v2 `email/` module and the `previews/v1` split. Replace the stale `deploy` script with `cf-deploy`, and add `cf-typegen`, `db:migrate:all:*` and `test:all`. List the full set of bindings in `wrangler.jsonc`. Add moderator-correct to the revalidation list and shorten the note on profile deletion.
Document the deprecated `status` alias for developer listings and update README links to the current extensions v2 sections.
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
api | b07fd3e | Oct 09 2026, 02:56 AM |
This comment was marked as low quality.
This comment was marked as low quality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 4 files
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e8856be525
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
0 issues found across 2 files (changes from recent commits).
Requires human review: Documentation refresh across root README, service READMEs, and AGENTS.md, but the extensions/v2 README diff is truncated, so I could not verify that the two dismissed cubic documentation findings are actually fixed.
Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic
Refresh root README, service READMEs, and AGENTS.md to match current code.