[tillywoodfield]

What & why

Libraries the pipelines call log through Python's logging, but the Dagster run log only shows what assets write to context.log, so their output never reaches it. This commits the local Dagster instance configuration and has it capture the root logger, so any library whose records propagate shows up in the run log.

Part of #20

Changes

• Track .dagster_home/dagster.yaml, with python_logs capturing the root logger at INFO. The rest of .dagster_home/ stays ignored.
• Drop the mkdir .dagster_home setup step from the README, since the directory now comes with the clone.

Notes for reviewers

• If you have your own untracked .dagster_home/dagster.yaml, git pull will refuse to overwrite it. Move it aside before pulling, and carry over anything you rely on.
• The file is local-only. Dagster+ ignores it and takes the same setting from its deployment settings, which come with Set up continuous deployment to Dagster+ from main #30.
• Root capture only sees libraries whose records propagate. oda_reader's already do. dcp-tools' will once fix: leave logging configuration to consumers ONEcampaign/dcp-tools#189 is released and pinned, and imf_reader and oda_data need the same fix. The dfo-ontology CLI's stderr on success is a separate PR. Show library and subprocess output in the Dagster run log #20 stays open until those land.

Checklist

• Addresses one issue, linked above
• Tests updated where relevant
• Docs updated where relevant
• Self-reviewed the diff

[tillywoodfield]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-19T15:22:16.276708Z	cdb1735	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

Reviewed commit: cdb1735bb9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".