Repository navigation
test: add ACL IPE audit scenarios - #10040
Draft
aadhar-agarwal wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
aadhar-agarwal wants to merge 1 commit into
aadhar-agarwal wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
Windows Unit Test Results 3 files 21 suites 55s ⏱️ Results for commit 8cf2aad. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
aadhar-agarwal
force-pushed
the
aadagarwal/acl-ipe-audit-e2e
branch
from
November 10, 2026 21:57
e43d8cc to
b05db1e
Compare
| grep -Eq '(^|[[:space:]])root_hash_sig_key_desc[[:space:]]+[^[:space:]]+' <<< "$table" | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ipe_check_containerd() { |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nit] do we also want to have a check for the non-IPE config making sure overlayfs remains the default?
| [[ "$active" == 1 && "$enforce" == 0 ]] | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ipe_check_signed_verity() { |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nit] do we also want to check if the cmdline hash matches the hash in the verity table?
Dallas Delaney (dallasd1)
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2026
Add AMD64 and ARM64 IPE audit scenarios using the existing ACL image selection and runner behavior. Check active audit policy, signed usr and EROFS configuration, then compare execution from usr with its writable copy. Both must succeed; only the copy should produce an audit denial. Check that normal ACL nodes retain overlayfs using the running containerd config, and that the signed usr verity root hash matches the boot usrhash. Include focused regression-test source and explanations of the audit evidence safeguards. Initial audit behavior passed pipeline 190357204 at e43d8cc. Later review changes have not been tested; no further tests were run for the Dallas comment fixes. Source reviewed with Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok 4.7. Signed-off-by: Aadhar Agarwal <aadagarwal@microsoft.com>
aadhar-agarwal
force-pushed
the
aadagarwal/acl-ipe-audit-e2e
branch
from
November 10, 2026 22:49
b05db1e to
8cf2aad
Compare
Contributor
|
Contributor
|
Contributor
|
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add AMD64 and ARM64 IPE audit scenarios using the existing ACL image selection and runner behavior. Check active audit policy, signed usr and EROFS configuration, then compare execution from usr with its writable copy. Both must succeed; only the copy should produce an audit denial.
[TEST All VHDs] AKS Linux VHD Build - Msft Tenant - Passed
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #